Windows app updates are manual or hard to control
Windows users may put off updates when they have to find, download, and run installers themselves, while automatic downloads can be unwelcome on limited data plans. Windows app developers also need a reliable way to check for, download, and install releases, including handling a running app. The signals point to different sides of the update problem, but not to a single widely adopted solution or to demand size.
For windows desktop app users and indie developers. Mentioned from Nov 2017 to Feb 2026 on GitHub, Hacker News and Stack Exchange.
4 different people described this problem in 4 separate discussions.
- Indie fit
- 6.0/10
- Pain
- 7.0/10
- Frequency
- 5.8/10
- Willingness to pay
- 0.0/10
- Momentum
- 5.0/10
- Who pays
- Businesses
- Competition
- Medium
- Build difficulty
- Medium
What people said
Quoted word for word. Follow a link to read the whole discussion.
I usually procrastinate downloading updates because it's such a pain in the ass -- and that's not what you want your users to be doing
I am looking for - a .NET/C# library - that checks a website for the availability of updates (I guess that I can provide whatever file they need to do that) - can download the update in the background - can install the update, first closing all running applications
Build brief
See what to build and who will buy it
- 1 product idea with the smallest useful version and pricing
- 4 places to find your first customers
- 2 more quotes from people who have this problem
- Current workarounds, existing solutions and risks