Software teams discover requirement gaps too late
Developers and engineering teams describe planning and reviewing requirements as a way to avoid rework, conflicting expectations, and last-minute fixes. The pain spans AI-generated user stories, stakeholder alignment, and technical planning before implementation. But doing that upfront can feel tedious, so people either create ad hoc review processes or skip thorough planning.
For software developers and engineering teams. Mentioned from Jul 2024 to Dec 2025 on Hacker News.
4 different people described this problem in 4 separate discussions.
- Indie fit
- 4.0/10
- Pain
- 5.5/10
- Frequency
- 5.8/10
- Willingness to pay
- 0.0/10
- Momentum
- 5.0/10
- Who pays
- Businesses
- Competition
- Medium
- Build difficulty
- Medium
What people said
Quoted word for word. Follow a link to read the whole discussion.
We are now writing AI review process for our user stories to counter the AI generation of the product team
Not to mention the gap that always happens between the engineers (who build and do the work) and the clients or stakeholders (who require the work), which always ends up with last-minute changes and fixes before the demo
tamimio on Hacker NewsJul 2024
Build brief
See what to build and who will buy it
- 2 product ideas with the smallest useful version and pricing
- 4 places to find your first customers
- 2 more quotes from people who have this problem
- Current workarounds, existing solutions and risks