IdeaSift

Social users can't precisely filter unwanted content from feeds

Social and news feed readers want to hide specific topics, people, or images without losing unrelated posts. Signals describe native controls that can be too broad, apply beyond the feed a person wants to filter, or require muting posts one at a time. A browser tool could improve filtering on supported websites, but no small product can reliably control every app and mobile feed.

For social and news feed readers seeking selective content filters. Mentioned from Apr 2024 to Jul 2026 on Bluesky and Hacker News.

20 different people described this problem in 18 separate discussions.

Week of 2026-07-13: 0Week of 2026-07-20: 0Week of 2026-07-27: 1Week of 2026-08-03: 0Week of 2026-08-10: 0Week of 2026-08-17: 0Week of 2026-08-24: 0Week of 2026-08-31: 0Week of 2026-09-07: 0Week of 2026-09-14: 0Week of 2026-09-21: 0Week of 2026-09-28: 0
1 mention in the last 12 weeks
Indie fit
4.0/10
Pain
5.0/10
Frequency
10.0/10
Willingness to pay
5.9/10
Momentum
4.7/10
Who pays
Consumers
Competition
Medium
Build difficulty
Medium

What people said

Quoted word for word. Follow a link to read the whole discussion.

  1. i can't mute "vote" or "voting" because that would cast too wide a net but good lord i would pay money not to see more posting about whether or not people are voting in the presidential election
    pghguy.bsky.social on BlueskyApr 2024Asked for a toolWould pay
  2. Wish there was a Bluesky feed that filtered out all sports- related posts. I would pay $$$ for a browser extension that did that for everything.
    wordfarmer.bsky.social on BlueskyOct 2025Asked for a toolWould pay
Build brief

See what to build and who will buy it

  • 2 product ideas with the smallest useful version and pricing
  • 4 places to find your first customers
  • 18 more quotes from people who have this problem
  • Current workarounds, existing solutions and risks