Readers struggle to support many websites with one payment
Readers who want fewer ads and want to support the websites they use face fragmented subscriptions and repeated payment friction. Some pay for only a subset of sites and read the rest without paying, while others see individual subscriptions as too costly for the sites they visit occasionally. The signals point to demand for one payment that can be shared among participating websites, but they do not establish that publishers would broadly adopt it.
For ad-averse readers who regularly visit independent websites. Mentioned from Jan 2024 to Dec 2024 on Hacker News.
4 different people described this problem in 4 separate discussions.
- Indie fit
- 3.0/10
- Pain
- 6.0/10
- Frequency
- 5.8/10
- Willingness to pay
- 8.7/10
- Momentum
- 5.0/10
- Who pays
- Businesses
- Competition
- Medium
- Build difficulty
- High
What people said
Quoted word for word. Follow a link to read the whole discussion.
I'd pay $100/yr to have ads removed from every site I visit, and have my $100 distributed among the websites that I visit most
I would happily pay a subscription that gets divided among whatever sites I visit. In the absence of that option, I pay for a subset of sites and freeload the rest
Build brief
See what to build and who will buy it
- 2 product ideas with the smallest useful version and pricing
- 3 places to find your first customers
- 2 more quotes from people who have this problem
- Current workarounds, existing solutions and risks