Fans lack flexible ways to pay creators outside ads and subscriptions
Fans who want to support individual creators often face ads or recurring subscriptions instead of a simple per-article, per-podcast, or per-video payment. Creators also want more direct and predictable earnings, while some fans want to keep their real names private from the recipient. Hosting and platform-specific monetization requests appear in the evidence too, but a direct-payment product could address the shared need across most signals.
For independent creators and their fans. Mentioned from Oct 2023 to Nov 2025 on Bluesky, Hacker News and Stack Exchange.
10 different people described this problem in 10 separate discussions.
- Indie fit
- 4.0/10
- Pain
- 5.4/10
- Frequency
- 8.6/10
- Willingness to pay
- 7.7/10
- Momentum
- 5.0/10
- Who pays
- Professionals
- Competition
- High
- Build difficulty
- Medium
What people said
Quoted word for word. Follow a link to read the whole discussion.
I wish there were a simple way to be able to pay content creators (and by extension somehow the platform they are hosting their content on) for just the content
I would pay to watch videos using microtransactions on a platform that is not owned by a depraved company
Build brief
See what to build and who will buy it
- 2 product ideas with the smallest useful version and pricing
- 4 places to find your first customers
- 8 more quotes from people who have this problem
- Current workarounds, existing solutions and risks