IdeaSift

Developers struggle to recover code and context after undo

Developers using editors and coding assistants can lose useful code changes or earlier session details when undo history is unavailable, overwritten, or difficult to revisit. Some resort to repeatedly prompting an assistant to reverse changes or manually searching session logs. The signals point to a shared need for safer, more persistent recovery, though restoring chat context and restoring files are distinct tasks.

For software developers using editors and coding assistants. Mentioned from Feb 2017 to Feb 2026 on GitHub and Hacker News.

8 different people described this problem in 7 separate discussions.

Week of 2026-07-13: 0Week of 2026-07-20: 0Week of 2026-07-27: 0Week of 2026-08-03: 0Week of 2026-08-10: 0Week of 2026-08-17: 0Week of 2026-08-24: 0Week of 2026-08-31: 0Week of 2026-09-07: 0Week of 2026-09-14: 0Week of 2026-09-21: 0Week of 2026-09-28: 0
0 mentions in the last 12 weeks
Indie fit
6.0/10
Pain
5.8/10
Frequency
7.9/10
Willingness to pay
0.0/10
Momentum
5.0/10
Who pays
Professionals
Competition
High
Build difficulty
Medium

What people said

Quoted word for word. Follow a link to read the whole discussion.

  1. If you need to revert multiple turns, you have to send the prompt, wait for the llm to finish, backtrack and rinse-repeat
  2. This is something I really miss coming from other tools (i.e. Cursor, Claude Code), would greatly appreciate to have this implemented
    gusaidler on GitHub (openai/codex)Feb 2026Asked for a toolWants to switch
Build brief

See what to build and who will buy it

  • 2 product ideas with the smallest useful version and pricing
  • 3 places to find your first customers
  • 6 more quotes from people who have this problem
  • Current workarounds, existing solutions and risks