Developers struggle to collect and compare performance results
Developers and performance engineers need to measure speed, memory use, resource consumption, or traces across runs, but the tools are fragmented and often omit the metrics or comparisons they need. Setting up repeatable regression tests can be tedious, while inspecting profiles and comparing traces may require extra scripts or manual work. The signals cover several performance-measurement workflows, so a useful first product should focus on a narrow shared task rather than try to replace every profiler and system monitor.
For software developers and performance engineers. Mentioned from Sep 2018 to Aug 2026 on Bluesky, GitHub, Hacker News and Stack Exchange.
37 different people described this problem in 35 separate discussions.
- Indie fit
- 5.0/10
- Pain
- 5.0/10
- Frequency
- 10.0/10
- Willingness to pay
- 1.6/10
- Momentum
- 4.4/10
- Who pays
- Professionals
- Competition
- High
- Build difficulty
- Medium
What people said
Quoted word for word. Follow a link to read the whole discussion.
It's tedious and sort of a chore to setup and a source of ongoing woes afterwards
jeffbee on Hacker NewsNov 2024the thing I most wish for when using time to benchmark programs is if it could measure other relevant program execution statistics, like memory usage
See what to build and who will buy it
- 2 product ideas with the smallest useful version and pricing
- 4 places to find your first customers
- 35 more quotes from people who have this problem
- Current workarounds, existing solutions and risks