IdeaSift

Developers lose time writing and recalling complex jq filters

Developers using jq for nontrivial JSON queries, transformations, and tests can spend substantial time digging through documentation and experimenting. Some know what they want to test but find translating it into jq tedious; others struggle to recall jq’s syntax. Today they rely on documentation, trial and error, and ChatGPT or other AI assistance.

For developers who query and transform JSON with jq. Mentioned from Nov 2023 to Mar 2026 on Hacker News.

4 different people described this problem in 4 separate discussions.

Week of 2026-07-13: 0Week of 2026-07-20: 0Week of 2026-07-27: 0Week of 2026-08-03: 0Week of 2026-08-10: 0Week of 2026-08-17: 0Week of 2026-08-24: 0Week of 2026-08-31: 0Week of 2026-09-07: 0Week of 2026-09-14: 0Week of 2026-09-21: 0Week of 2026-09-28: 0
0 mentions in the last 12 weeks
Indie fit
4.0/10
Pain
4.5/10
Frequency
5.8/10
Willingness to pay
0.0/10
Momentum
5.0/10
Who pays
Professionals
Competition
Medium
Build difficulty
Medium

What people said

Quoted word for word. Follow a link to read the whole discussion.

  1. For example I can write `jq` incantations, but it takes some time and man digging, so for non-trivial cases I can easily spend hour tinkering with it
    vbezhenar on Hacker NewsAug 2025Has a workaround
  2. In this case, it’s pretty easy to describe the tests I want to make in English, but translating that to jq commands is annoying and a bit tedious
    sothatsit on Hacker NewsMar 2025Has a workaround
Build brief

See what to build and who will buy it

  • 1 product idea with the smallest useful version and pricing
  • 3 places to find your first customers
  • 2 more quotes from people who have this problem
  • Current workarounds, existing solutions and risks