Claims are hard to verify against their original sources
Editors, researchers, and news readers want to check claims against source material, but claims and evidence are often scattered across drafts, articles, citations, and public statements. A citation or link alone may not make it easy to find the passage that supports a claim, and some people want a lasting record of claims that change or contradict one another. The signals point to demand for easier evidence review, but not necessarily for a tool that automatically decides what is true.
For editors, researchers, and news readers checking claims against sources. Mentioned from Jun 2024 to Jul 2026 on Bluesky, Hacker News and Stack Exchange.
9 different people described this problem in 9 separate discussions.
- Indie fit
- 4.0/10
- Pain
- 5.1/10
- Frequency
- 8.3/10
- Willingness to pay
- 3.3/10
- Momentum
- 5.0/10
- Who pays
- Businesses
- Competition
- Medium
- Build difficulty
- Medium
What people said
Quoted word for word. Follow a link to read the whole discussion.
I have a draft at Wikipedia and could do with some software to help with reviewing it against provided sources
Perhaps paper linting/scoring that penalizes assertive statements linked to references vs direct quotes associated with references?
See what to build and who will buy it
- 1 product idea with the smallest useful version and pricing
- 4 places to find your first customers
- 7 more quotes from people who have this problem
- Current workarounds, existing solutions and risks